| Name |
Last commit
|
Last update |
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| escales | ||
| manifeste | ||
| semaphore | ||
| tasks | ||
| tide-table | ||
| ui | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| DESIGN.md | ||
| PRODUCT.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| serve.py |
A second model (Sonnet) independently labeled all 534 tracks; emotion_drift.py
measures where it disagrees with the opus GT. Result:
mean V/A drift 0.322
quadrant agreement 72%
emotion Jaccard 0.53
174 uncertain-GT tracks (top-quartile drift or quadrant mismatch)
The disagreements aren't noise — they CONCENTRATE on genres that straddle the
circumplex, which is a real finding:
- hardstyle (The Prophet, Headhunterz): triumphant/euphoric (+,+) vs
aggressive/tense (-,+) — the genre's 'euphoric aggression' lives on the
quadrant line.
- uplifting trance (Cosmic Gate, Ferry Corsten, Markus Schulz): euphoric vs
driving/tense — same boundary.
- neoclassical (Nils Frahm, Ólafur Arnalds, Max Richter): calm-positive vs
melancholic-calm.
So ~33% of the corpus carries genuinely uncertain emotional GT, and it's
predictable WHICH third. Those tracks should be down-weighted (not trusted) in
the upcoming scale calibration — single-model GT would have hidden this.
| Name |
Last commit
|
Last update |
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| escales | Loading commit data... | |
| manifeste | Loading commit data... | |
| semaphore | Loading commit data... | |
| tasks | Loading commit data... | |
| tide-table | Loading commit data... | |
| ui | Loading commit data... | |
| .gitignore | Loading commit data... | |
| DESIGN.md | Loading commit data... | |
| PRODUCT.md | Loading commit data... | |
| README.md | Loading commit data... | |
| serve.py | Loading commit data... |