Written earlier today by the gear-repair session and left uncommitted, which
for this particular file is the one failure mode that matters: performance_notes
IS the archive, so an uncommitted entry is not a note, it is a memory.

Two signals, both about the rig rather than the audio:

- *"ok just played rose_rouge works great!"* — first confirmation that the
  CLASSIC LCXL (mk1, 1235:0061) is a fully viable performing surface once
  lcxl-leds-watch owns the paint. Worth recording precisely because the rig had
  drifted into treating the mk3 as the only real board; the classic is a
  fallback, not a downgrade.
- *"and the midi mon is beautiful!"* — on first sight of tools/bridge/midiviz.py.
  A taste signal about the rig's own UI, and the follow-up ask (always-open,
  always-on-top, every desktop) says it plainly: midiviz is an instrument of
  the rig, not a debug tool.

CLAUDE.md asks for every reaction captured durably because this corpus feeds
sampling, effect choices and the auto-mastering heuristics. Durably means
committed.