docs(board): point a cold reader at the truth, not at the oldest theory
TASKS_DUMP has accreted amendments since 2026-08-16 and the oldest sections are now the least true — but a reader arrives at the top, where A3 still says /take-five-drops uploaded '24s short', that every other track 'matched to the second', that 8 of 15 are up, and that no artwork exists. All four are wrong, and the first two are the exact reasoning that let six stale uploads pass a duration check in August. So: a READ THIS FIRST banner naming what is superseded and sending the reader to the resume points at the end, plus an inline stop sign at A3's 'TWO DEFECTS' where someone reading that epic top-down actually hits it. The wrong diagnosis is kept rather than deleted, because the reasoning being auditable is the point — it just no longer gets to be the first thing anyone reads. A board whose front page is a year of stale confidence is worse than no board. Nobody rewrites 1700 lines; they act on line 90.
Showing
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment