triangle: catalog confirmation view (A=score ⋈ C=metadata ⋈ B=recording)
Reconcile every track across three corners and light the cells where they agree or fight, so "is our analysis good?" becomes a measured number. - build_catalog_view.py: reconciler over 73 tracks; pure build() + thin main(), validates against the pydantic CatalogView on emit - tidal_score.py: parse indented do-block dN (recovered burn_this_book + 13 more) - agree() taxonomy: unparsed / no-claim / agree / partial / conflict / divergent — a parser miss is NEVER reported as a disagreement (the cardinal fix) - models.py CatalogView → gen_ts_types.py → types.gen.ts (DRY single source) - tests/: 28 pytest — parser regressions, agree taxonomy, IT-on-real-data with coverage regression guards, DRY contract (mechanically tests the metadata prior) - triangle.html: Ship's Bridge lit-cell dashboard (served by serve.py) - tasks/013: captain's log Result: 47 agree / 5 partial / 2 conflict / 3 divergent / 16 no-claim; recorded 40/73; EDA coverage 1/63 (the gap, now visible). The first conflicts flagged were our own parser bugs — metadata was righter than the machine.
Showing
armada/tide-table/build_catalog_view.py
0 → 100644
armada/tide-table/catalog_view.json
0 → 100644
This source diff could not be displayed because it is too large.
You can
view the blob
instead.
armada/tide-table/tests/conftest.py
0 → 100644
armada/tide-table/tests/test_agree.py
0 → 100644
armada/tide-table/tests/test_corners.py
0 → 100644
armada/tide-table/tests/test_tidal_score.py
0 → 100644
armada/tide-table/triangle.html
0 → 100644
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment